Evaluate · understand · operate

01 / 08

Rostrum documentation

Rostrum keeps a complicated speaker program legible—from the first proposal to the published room schedule. This documentation separates three different questions: how to evaluate it, how it works, and what an operator must still prove before a production launch.

Rostrum's guided product tour follows five people through one canonical program record

Start here

I am… Read this Outcome
A judge or reviewer Judging guide Complete the five-minute tour or run the full interactive path
An event organizer Self-hosting manual Install a fresh durable workspace and become its first organizer
A technical reviewer Architecture Understand components, trust boundaries, persistence, and limitations
An integration author API reference Consume the published event directory, schedule, and speakers
An operator Deployment reference Extend a deployment with Kubernetes, external projections, or the observer example
A release owner Launch readiness Collect the evidence still required for a production decision
A contributor or designer Visual system Preserve Rostrum’s Paper & Ink editorial field guide

Evaluation paths

The fictional evaluation fixture lives only under examples/demo/; generic Rostrum defaults stay fresh. Use the judge path for a complete, read-only five-persona workspace. Use the live path to create a first organizer and test mutations from a clean starter CFP. The hosted preview is a separate read-only deployment and should be used only after its preflight passes.

# Deterministic read-only judge path
make judge-demo

# Fresh, disposable organizer path
APP_MODE=live make dev

# Convenience preview preflight
curl -fsS https://rostrum.m31labs.dev/api/health
curl -fsS https://rostrum.m31labs.dev/api/v1/workspace

The fresh live command prints the local one-time /setup?token=… URL. Open that exact URL to create the first organizer. The judging guide explains the expected output and fallback behavior.

Product map

flowchart LR
    CFP["Call for speakers"] --> Route["Governed routing"]
    Route --> Review["Human review"]
    Review --> Decision["Accept / decline"]
    Decision --> Portal["Speaker portal & tasks"]
    Decision --> Agenda["Conflict-aware agenda"]
    Portal --> Publish["Publish"]
    Agenda --> Publish
    Publish --> Public["Agenda · gallery · API · calendars · embeds"]

Every stage reads and writes the same validated workspace. Rostrum does not maintain a second publishing database.

Source landmarks

Area Location
File-routed pages and server actions app/
Domain state and invariants internal/domain/
JSON, SQLite, and Postgres stores internal/store/
Public serialization boundary internal/publicapi/
Policy source and adapter rules/
Production manifests deploy/k8s/
Fictional evaluation example and smoke test examples/demo/
Size and runtime budgets size-budget.json, perf-budget.json

Honest status

The repository contains a complete credential-free local workflow and a fail-closed configuration for a fictional read-only preview. Credential-backed email, a chosen external database endpoint, live Accelevents/Airtable publishing, backup recovery, and the exact hosted release still require operator acceptance. No document in this directory treats a unit test or example outbox entry as proof of an external provider.